“Peace Plan”: NATO’s Grand Surrender

“Peace Plan”: NATO’s Grand Surrender

Wellington Calasans

From: https://jornalpurosangue.net/2025/11/21/plano-de-paz-rendicao-da-otan-em-grande-estilo/

Based on the alleged 28-point peace plan published by The Telegraph, which is said to have been drafted jointly by the United States and Russia, it becomes clear that the proposal signifies a significant geopolitical reconfiguration of Eastern Europe.

The agreement, which has not yet been officially confirmed by either side, would require drastic territorial concessions from Ukraine, including recognising Crimea and all of Donbass as Russian territories, along with freezing the frontlines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia.

The proposal would also curtail Ukrainian sovereignty by banning accession to NATO and imposing severe restrictions on its military capabilities, creating a new power balance that is clearly in favour of Russian interests in the region. This could be described as the victor’s trophy.

Europe’s attempt to reject the plan, on the grounds that it is a “humiliating capitulation,” proves problematic when examining its concrete details. It is time to curb arrogance and embrace what might be the last opportunity for an “honourable exit.”

The document mentions security guarantees and a robust reconstruction programme funded by frozen Russian assets—a Russian concession that no one could ignore as a gesture of “peace effort.”

For Europe and corrupt Ukrainian politicians, the core of the agreement undermines the Ukrainian territorial integrity established since 1991. Someone needs to warn these disconnected figures that defeat is unavoidable. I suggest they translate the song by singer and philosopher Falcão: “I think it’s better to escape smelling bad than to die smelling good.”

Reintegrating Russia into the G7 (making it G8 again) and gradually lifting sanctions would mean normalising international relations with Moscow—a coherent way to undo all the mistakes initiated by the non-compliance with the Minsk Agreements.

The greatest challenge will be ensuring that all involved enforce effective oversight mechanisms and face clear consequences for future breaches of the peace agreement and security guarantees, as only then will these promises be genuinely sincere.

If the European Union insists on keeping Ukraine “like a zombie”—economically dependent on external aid and militarily unable to defend its full territorial integrity—the consequences would be even more devastating for the European project.

The continent is already facing a relative decline in global influence, with Germany particularly affected by energy crises and accelerated deindustrialisation. German companies are losing ground, with no concrete prospects for response or competitiveness.

Maintaining a permanently dependent client state would exhaust Europe’s already limited resources, deepen internal divisions among member states, and strengthen euro-sceptic narratives. If concerns about the rise of what is called the far right extremism are valid, it’s time to stop repeating the same mistakes.

Furthermore, this scenario would turn Ukraine into a permanent battleground for foreign influence, driven by the spectre of Russian invasion, disguised as defence of Ukrainian sovereignty, undermining any remaining credibility of Western security promises to neighbouring countries, since in practice it amounts to using a country as territory for a proxy war.

The proposed scenario reflects a military and geopolitical reality in which Western bargaining power has substantially diminished since the conflict began. US reluctance to supply long-range weapons to Ukraine, along with increasing war fatigue in European capitals, has created conditions for an agreement that prioritises immediate stability through realistic points aimed at securing peace…